At first glance,
Oscar Wilde's "The Picture of Dorian Gray" might appear as an
edifying novel preaching the importance of leading an aesthetic life. After
all, Wilde truly fascinates his readers with Dorian’s attractiveness and Lord
Henry’s brilliant sense of speech, in spite of their pursuit of hedonistic lifestyle
filled with immorality in the name of aestheticism. On the other hand, Wilde
portrays Basil as a coward with no real taste of the ‘meaningful’ things in
life who eventually faces brutal death. Taking into consideration Basil’s job
as an artist, he is the one who is the most justified to lead a life dominated
by aestheticism. However, he nevertheless lives an upright life. The dramatic
difference makes a clear distinction between the boundaries of moral and mad
pursuit of aestheticism. Basil’s words, “I felt, Dorian, that I had told too
much, that I had put too much of myself into it,” indicate that he believes in
the different nature of artwork and real life. Dorian and Lord Henry, on the contrary,
regard actual incidents in life as mere artwork, an experiment for pure joy and
beauty, even. Such attitude is aptly explicated in Lord Henry’s own words about
Dorian’s “experimental” love towards Sibyl Bane: “He would be a wonderful study”
and “If you want to mar a nature, you have merely to reform it.” Therefore, it
is perhaps more accurate to assume that this Gothic novel is an ironic work
dealing with the need of realizing the discrepancy between artistic desire for
beauty and real life. In this sense, the intimate yet somewhat ironic juxtaposition
of two types of characters with very different values and attitudes achieves
its clear moral of the novel regarding art and life.
Very good. Much improved, and though complex - it adds up at the end nicely. The only issue I see is getting Sibyl's name wrong. It's Vane, not Bane. Bane is from Batman.
ReplyDeleteIn any case, I think you wrote three very different versions of this, and arrived at the best possible one through a bit of hard work. Very good.